Utah Man Hate Crimes Himself- Twice
This Utah man by the name of Rick Jones, faked two hate crimes against himself because as a psycho leftist attention whore, one hate crime just isn’t enough. He carved FAG into his own arm and then vandalized his parent’s garage and immediately opened up a GoFundMe page to scam people out of cash. And the best of all, this is all covered by the great Taiwanese Animators.
From NYDailyNews here:
A Utah man vandalized his family’s property, carved a hateful slur into his own arm and reported the attack as a hate crime — a scheme he now says was his way of “crying out for help” after he told his family he is gay.
Rick Jones spun a tale that convinced his family, politicians and residents in his rural hometown of Delta that someone jumped him outside his family’s pizzeria on April 25. He told authorities that he woke up with the words “die f–” etched into his arm.
Those words were repeated nearly a week later, when a purported vandal spray-painted them onto the home of Jones’ family about 130 miles south of Salt Lake City. More recently, the perpetrator was said to have chucked a rock and a fire bomb through their window, reported the Salt Lake Tribune.
That vandal, it turned out, was none other than Rick Jones. The 21-year-old admitted his stunt to Millard County Sheriff’s Office investigators and his parents about three weeks after he first reported the violent encounter.
“To the parents, it was a cry for help,” likely intended for their attention only, Jones’ attorney, Brett Tolman, told the Daily News. “The fact that it became such news so quickly was pretty overwhelming for a family and an individual like this.”
The good news is that this attention-seeking gay man is going to get his head examined to find out why he loathes himself so much that he would be a cutter and a vandal. Probably a great step! But it won’t be long before someone declares that any mental health evaluation will be considered “anti-gay.”
No surprise that the story turned out to be false.
If homosexuals getting bashed and killed in unprovoked attacks was common, then it would not be in news because it would not be interesting. Going out & attacking people with no provocation is stupid but yes, there are stupid people and when this happens it is reported in news. Most domestic violence & rape/sex abuse cases do not get reported in news in most cases unless it is let’s say a famous person accused of rape or hitting his girlfriend or an unusual or strange case because there are so many of these cases that they would not be interesting.
When I read a gay (transexuals are mutilated gays/lesbians and they must abolish sex changes) bashing case in the news, I wonder what the view is of the journalist reporting this on homosexuality/lesbianism. I also wonder if the journalist is a homosexual or lesbian and if so, are they setting aside their bias and reporting the news with no problems. I do not trust news that I get from Daily Kos or the Huffington Post on their coverage of gay bashing cases because they predictably make the homosexual look like an innocent victim no matter what wrong the gay does.
With homosexuals, it is far more common for homosexuals to molest boys but most of these cases do not get reported in the news unless it’s a famous homosexual such as Jerry A. Sandusky. Homosexuals often target teenage boys because they think the teenage boys are easy targets to sexually abuse and some of the teenage boys fight back. Most men and boys who are victims of gays usu. won’t call cops to report that a gay is committing indecent exposure, harassment or in worst cases molestation until some1 reacts violently and bashes the gay.
A gay bashing case I know of from Arizona. What had happened was that an 18 year old boy had been in a park with friends. A gay who was much bigger than him grabbed the boy’s butt & made a sex comment. The boy then told his 2 friends. After this, the 2 men grabbed the gay, brought him to the boy who then hit the gay several times in the face. That ‘gay bashing’ victim committed a crime-assault&battery & boy reacted by bashing him. If that teenage boy had tried to walk away, that gay who was much bigger than him would likely have attacked him (possibly homosexual rape) because the gay had a violent history (unreported to cops) of beating up teenage boys after harassing them for sex & these cases unpredictable-that teenager boy would likely have ended up in the hospital. To say that ass grabbing is the only crime the gay was going to do is dishonest. Better to do too much than not enough in cases like that. With that gay, it’s highly likely the gay was trying to do something more violent than ass grabbing, so that gay deserves no sympathy for getting hit in the face.
This gay again had beaten up other teenage boys after committing assault & battery (ass grabbing), was likely trying to do it to this teenager boy, but because this teenager boy had 2 friends (1 a martial arts expert) who were with him, they were able to defend this boy before he got beaten up. If the homosexual is high on drugs (many gays drugjunkies) such as cocaine as that gay possibly was then it’s likely the gay would’ve done more violent crime in a cocaine rage if indeed the gay was high. Self-defense is a jury topic after hearing both prosecutor & defense lawyer & jury decides if gay basher used reasonable or excessive force. Most gay bashings are men reacting to crimes which the homosexual first did such as after a homosexual committed indecent exposure, assault & battery or other crime.
While harassment & indecent exposure alone does not justify killing a person, indecent exposure may not be the only crime intended. When homosexuals commit sex abuse, the first thing they do is commit indecent exposure, stalking assault and battery before doing something worse. If the homosexual is high on drugs such as Meth or Cocaine while committing indecent exposure, then it is possible for a homosexual who is committing indecent exposure to commit violence in a drug rage, even commit murder in a drug rage. There’s no need for a man to say no to a homosexual who is committing indecent exposure, etc. because there’s no need to say no to a crime the other had no right to do.
If it is true the homosexual was doing antisocial conduct before he was bashed, then yes, a jury must decide if it was justified or excess force to end the abuse. If a defense lawyer in a gay bashing case wants to raise a crime the gay did such as harassment, indecent exposure, etc. before man reacted violently, then that must be regarded in deciding verdict. I would rather have too much done than not enough in that I would rather have a case where a jury decides if a man’s reaction to bashing or killing a homosexual is justified or excess vs. the man doesn’t do enough and the gay does something worse.