Reason 277 to HomeSchool: Drunken Special Ed Teacher Won’t Take Your Kid for a Joyride at 2AM
Meet Valerie Roesler. She is 27 and spent a long time at college to become a teacher. And then a bit more time to be certified as a special education teacher. But she threw all of that time and money away when she took a 15 year old kid out for a drunken joy ride at 2 AM Sunday morning.
From Fox here with thanks to Cathy:
A 27-year-old Fairfax County school teacher is facing charges after she was caught in a car with a 15-year-old boy early Sunday morning.
Valerie Roesler of Alexandria is charged with being drunk in public and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Roesler and the 15 year old were found by police in a 2008 Mitsubishi Lancer parked in the 7900 block of Gunston Hill Lane just before 2 a.m. on Sunday. Roesler was drunk.
The boy had left home without his parents’ knowledge.
Roesler, who is a first-year special education teacher at Hayfield Secondary School, met the boy earlier this year, but he is not a student at the school where she is employed. Roesler was arrested and taken to the Fairfax County Adult Detention Center, where she was charged.
She was probably trying to get her rape on. Special education teachers are always in heat.
A woman can’t rape a 15 year old boy. Ministers do. Boys and girls are different.
Ministers account for 1/100th of the sex assaults compared to public school teachers. And just because you don’t agree with the law doesn’t change the fact that this woman raped the boy.
Pat, you say the woman RAPED this boy? Bear in mind that this is STATUTORY rape we are talking about and NOT forcible rape! Boys and Girls(nottomention men and women)are different as Nah pointed out. Since the woman, or girl if she’s underage, is the one who ultimately has to bear the consequences of sex and its perfectly fair to have a double standard when it comes to sexual relationships between adults and teenagers. I dont agree with the law nor will I use such loaded terminology as *rape* when it comes to this situation. If an attractive adult woman had offered me sex when I was 15, I would most certainly not have refused.
Yeah Anton, if the teacher was having sex with the child, which the article does not say, it would be RAPE. A child is incapable of consenting to sex with an adult.
I know you have had problems for years wrapping your mind around it. Perhaps this is one of the topics you talk to yourself out loud about, which is probably the main reason why you can’t get a woman to date you, even from your online profile.
If you think a female is incapable of rape because she biologically bears the burden of the consequences, this just makes you a moron.
Pat, I do NOT think that a female is incapable of raping an average 15 year old boy because she has to bear the biological consequences. I think such is true because by the time most boys are 15 they already have the upper hand over most women when it comes to size and strength. If a 15-year-old high school football player forced a woman teacher in her 20s to have sex with him(as in aggravated rape), should SHE be the one to get punished for Statutory Rape despite the fact that the kid was bigger and stronger and so her attempts to fight him off were moot? Unless the boy in question were exceptionally small and weak, it seems totally obvious that he AGREED to do it and that he Wanted it despite the fact that the law will not recognize his wishes since he’s below the age of consent.
You have some weird fantasies yug_zohoth@yahoo.com. If a child is a rapist, the woman can’t be accused of statutory rape. But hundreds of women are in jail for rape.
This is a true example of “whisper down the lane”. I know both parties involved and know the circumstances of that evening. How many other young people, in this case both, are victims of a jump to judgement by the police and media for sensational reasons? There is a reason why Miss Roesler did not end up in jail. There was no “joy ride” or any sexual intent on her part. She was actually driving home from a date with an appropriate aged young man when she received a call from this boy, a former student who had stolen her phone in order to retrieve her number and as witnessed by other students and reported at trial. This boy told her he had snuck out of his home and was suggesting he was upset. It was very late and Miss Roesler did not have either his parents phone number or that of anyone that may have known him from her prior school. She was minutes from his location so made the decision to pull into the townhouse development where he was found. Within minutes the neighborhood cop arrived and the rest was history. She also was not “drunk” as was reported. In this picture she was crying for the police were accusing her of ill will and not interested in hearing her story at that moment. The judge told her she should have called the police which she immediately admitted was a big mistake on her part. Young teachers think they can save their students but in this jump to judgement atmosphere unfortunately they do not always have that power. She is absolutely quilty of thinking she could handle a situation that clearly she could not. All other accusations are patently false. She can legally teach but because of the trauma of this event has chosen to use her education and many accomplishments elsewhere. Both she and this young man are doing very well and both are hard working and productive members of society. Oh and by the way, the police took her cell phone, computer, and anything else that would hold possible communication between she and this boy or others for that matter. There was no incriminating evidence on any of these items.