Elizabeth Edwards Eats a Tasty Shit Sandwich on Oprah
Elizabeth Edwards, the rapidly aging, cancer-riddled wife of failed Presidential candidate John Edwards, went on Oprah to deny that her husband spawned a love child with Rielle Hunter. But rather than showing any respect for herself and leave her cheating man, like all Democratic wives of cheating husbands, she would rather stick it out with a man in a loveless marriage. Hillary did it for the power. Apparently Elizabeth Edwards is doing it because she has a kick-ass 21,000 28,000 sq. foot mansion.
Three months after John Edwards knocked up Rielle Hunter, he kept a straight face to accept the Father of the Year Award. Bwaaa Haaaa!!
From the NYDailyNews here:
Despite John Edwards’ denials that he fathered a baby with his onetime mistress, his betrayed wife Elizabeth said she has “no idea” whether the former presidential candidate is a new dad.
In an exclusive interview set to air Thursday, Oprah Winfrey asks Elizabeth Edwards about rampant speculation that he is the father of campaign videographer Rielle Hunter’s one-year-old daughter.
“I’ve seen a picture of the baby. I have no idea. It doesn’t look like my children but I don’t have any idea,” Edwards told Winfrey.
The couple is still living together in their 28,000-square-foot home in Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Asked if their relationship is day to day, Edwards replied, “Neither one of us is out the door so I guess it’s day by day, but maybe it’s month by month.”
But Rielle Hunter wants to have a DNA test. Why won’t John Edwards do it?
Re: “Rielle Hunter wants to have a DNA test. Why won’t John Edwards do it?”
Can’t she get a court order, to confirm paternity, for support purposes at least? Of course, the scumsac is a lawyer…
You mean gliberals don’t really care about single mothers?
The difference beeetwn the Limbaugh story and the Edwards story is that mainstream media sources picked up the Limbaugh story, and Rush eventually admitted his addiction. I also think El Rushbo’s arrogance had to do with the response.AI is correct that sometimes “tabloid” articles are shown to be true. The vast majority, though, seem to be poorly researched rumors that remain only in the National Enquirer. When I see it on Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the New York Times, etc. then I will believe it.